Over the last three years, I have talked about asthma, air pollution, and digital health to at least 50 different groups. Most recently I shared the Institute’s work at the February meeting of the St. Margaret Mary Elementary school board. Next month I’ll be talking with the Building Industry Association of Greater Louisville. I also have attended scientific and medical presentations and public meetings. One frequent problem that pops up subject matter experts talk with a general audience is communication. Typically a technical expert and a citizen don’t have a shared language. Each group has to make an effort to connect and actually converse.
In February, I spoke at the monthly meeting of the Rubbertown Community Advisory Committee. The group works to develop mutual trust between chemical companies and residents and to provide two-way communication on community and industry concerns. The table tent in the picture above sets the ground rules for the conversations at these meetings. These rules address many of the problems I have experienced at conversations between average citizens and scientists, researchers and engineers. In my experience, people in both groups are well-meaning, capable and engaged. Researchers and technical experts care about doing a thorough and thoughtful job when analyzing environmental conditions and related health risks. Community residents have thoughtful questions about complex topics and completely justified concerns about their homes and their health.
The breakdown comes when the two groups meet without clear ground rules like the ones the Rubbertown CAC uses. When scientists use technical language or jargon, this shuts down the conversation. It’s easy to get intimidated when you don’t understand a word and just as easy to slip into acronym shorthand when you use it all day with colleagues.
I know the rules work because I saw several of them in action. The bold rules in the list below are the ones that people in the meeting used to clarify a point or gently remind a technical expert about how to interact with people who are not scientists.
In my experience, subject matter experts and scientists would find it easier to connect with residents if they remember #5, #7 and #10.
Meetings in general would be better if everyone followed the first three rules.
In the latest issue, Lyndsay writes about encountering sewage in two parts of town – a park and a bar – after the recent heavy rains:
While strolling in Louisville’s Cherokee Park on a dreary, rainy day last week, my friend, Anna, stopped to look at a soggy piece of white paper hanging from a tree branch. “Is that toilet paper?” she asked.
I nodded slowly in disbelief. We walked a little farther, where we discovered a giant, stagnant pile of trash under a bridge along Beargrass Creek. There were basketballs, footballs, bottles, paper, hundreds of styrofoam cups and to-go containers. More litter was strewn along the banks of the creek and in the trees. Brown water soaked the grass under our shoes. The air was humid, clammy, and smelled of raw sewage.
The day after we walked around the park, Anna and I went to a jazz club in downtown Louisville located a couple of blocks from the Ohio River. Halfway through the set, water rose from the drain, covering the floors in several inches of murky water.
On the same day, WFPL reported that the Metro Council delayed a vote on allowing MSD to increase rates to update our Civil War era infrastructure:
MSD is again seeking to raise rates to cover expenses for what it says are necessary infrastructure upgrades. The measure has failed passage in Metro Council in the past, most recently last year.
MSD has spent some $700 million on projects for the federal consent decree to reduce sewage overflows into the Ohio River. The deadline for that project is 2024. MSD is not able to do much beyond consent decree work with its current budget, MSD executive director Tony Parrott said.
MSD estimates that the higher rate would add about $10 to the average bill, which goes out every two months.
On Sunday after breakfast at The Silver Dollar, I drove over Beargrass Creek going north on Frankfort Avenue just after Mellwood. The water was a murky teal. The stream looked like a settling pool or water holding tank that you usually see in a water processing facility. I guess that is what our natural waterways have become – free range sewage processing plants. The intersection of the two news stories from the previous week – sewage everywhere but no will to fix it – popped back into my mind.
You don’t have to live on River Road or in West Point to feel the effects of our city’s overwhelmed sewer system. It’s hard to imagine that the combination of news stories (four billion gallons of stormwater and raw sewage into the Ohio River and Beargrass Creek over the last five days) and first-hand experiences with sewage (toilet paper in the park) isn’t enough to generate sufficient will in the Metro Council to give MSD the ability to solve the problem. As Mr. Parrott said last fall, the rate hike requests aren’t going away.
Last year was a busy one for the Institute. We hosted 14 events, gave 11 national presentations about our work and 10 local presentations. We completed the AIR Louisville project with 251,379 data points about asthma medication use and 1.4 million related environmental data points. We published report cards for the asthma project and Green for Good. This study tested the idea that a greener neighborhood is a healthier one.
In October we launched Green Heart, a project that builds on Green for Good by expanding the idea to a neighborhood level. On October 26, we had speakers at the Kentucky African American Heritage Center, tours of the neighborhood and a dinner to celebrate. This project is a collaboration that includes the University of Louisville, Hyphae Design Lab, Washington University in St. Louisville, the Institute, and The Nature Conservancy. The five-year project will test the hypothesis that a greener neighborhood is a healthier one. Lauren Anderson of t*he Institute has taken the lead on community outreach. She has met with leaders in the south Louisville neighborhood where the study will take place. Lauren completed 30 engagement meetings in 2017 and has more on the schedule for 2018. The Institute also hired Jennifer Nunn, a resident of the Green Heart neighborhood. She is offering feedback on the project to the leadership team and connecting with residents in the neighborhood.
Also in 2017, city government leaders worked on an update to the Comprehensive Plan. Based on data from AIR Louisville, we proposed 2 new policies:
In 2017, we worked with City Lab to host Louisville in Harmony. The goal of this event was to define the next phase of the cross-sector collaboration that powered AIR Louisville. Now that the three-year community asthma project is complete, how can we take the energy and analysis from that work and direct it at a new project to improve the health of everyone in Louisville? At this event, we heard from Health Ambassadors who had developed their own unique collaborations across companies, organizations and individuals. The group then took on three challenges found in many Louisville neighborhoods:
We are finishing a report on the event and will be identifying next steps for one of these challenges by the end of Q1.
In addition to getting the word out in Louisville about our work, the Institute team traveled around the country to share our research and citizen science projects with other interested groups.
— Mayor Greg Fischer (@louisvillemayor) February 25, 2017